[svsm-devel] [PATCH v4 15/15] x86/sev: Allow non-VMPL0 execution when an SVSM is present
Tom Lendacky
thomas.lendacky at amd.com
Fri May 31 21:16:20 CEST 2024
On 5/31/24 09:54, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 10:58:11AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>> @@ -624,8 +626,12 @@ void sev_enable(struct boot_params *bp)
>> * modifies permission bits, it is still ok to do so currently because Linux
>> * SNP guests running at VMPL0 only run at VMPL0, so VMPL1 or higher
>> * permission mask changes are a don't-care.
>> + *
>> + * Running at VMPL0 is not required if an SVSM is present and the hypervisor
>> + * supports the required SVSM GHCB events.
>> */
>> - if (rmpadjust((unsigned long)&boot_ghcb_page, RMP_PG_SIZE_4K, 1))
>> + if (rmpadjust((unsigned long)&boot_ghcb_page, RMP_PG_SIZE_4K, 1) &&
>> + !(vmpl && (hv_features & GHCB_HV_FT_SNP_MULTI_VMPL)))
>> sev_es_terminate(SEV_TERM_SET_LINUX, GHCB_TERM_NOT_VMPL0);
>> }
>
> Let's make that more readable:
Will do.
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev.c
> index fb1e60165cd1..157f749faba0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/sev.c
> @@ -610,8 +610,10 @@ void sev_enable(struct boot_params *bp)
> * features.
> */
> if (sev_status & MSR_AMD64_SEV_SNP_ENABLED) {
> - u64 hv_features = get_hv_features();
> + u64 hv_features;
> + int rmpadj_ret;
But I'll probably just call this 'ret'.
>
> + hv_features = get_hv_features();
> if (!(hv_features & GHCB_HV_FT_SNP))
> sev_es_terminate(SEV_TERM_SET_GEN, GHCB_SNP_UNSUPPORTED);
>
> @@ -626,11 +628,15 @@ void sev_enable(struct boot_params *bp)
> * modifies permission bits, it is still ok to do so currently because Linux
> * SNP guests running at VMPL0 only run at VMPL0, so VMPL1 or higher
> * permission mask changes are a don't-care.
> - *
> + */
> + rmpadj_ret = rmpadjust((unsigned long)&boot_ghcb_page, RMP_PG_SIZE_4K, 1);
> +
> + /*
> * Running at VMPL0 is not required if an SVSM is present and the hypervisor
> * supports the required SVSM GHCB events.
> */
> - if (rmpadjust((unsigned long)&boot_ghcb_page, RMP_PG_SIZE_4K, 1) &&
> +
> + if (rmpadj_ret &&
> !(vmpl && (hv_features & GHCB_HV_FT_SNP_MULTI_VMPL)))
> sev_es_terminate(SEV_TERM_SET_LINUX, GHCB_TERM_NOT_VMPL0);
> }
>
>> -static int __init report_cpuid_table(void)
>> +static void __init report_cpuid_table(void)
>> {
>> const struct snp_cpuid_table *cpuid_table = snp_cpuid_get_table();
>>
>> if (!cpuid_table->count)
>> - return 0;
>> + return;
>>
>> pr_info("Using SNP CPUID table, %d entries present.\n",
>> cpuid_table->count);
>>
>> if (sev_cfg.debug)
>> dump_cpuid_table();
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void __init report_vmpl_level(void)
>> +{
>> + if (!cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_SEV_SNP))
>> + return;
>> +
>> + pr_info("SNP running at VMPL%u.\n", vmpl);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int __init report_snp_info(void)
>> +{
>> + report_vmpl_level();
>> + report_cpuid_table();
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> -arch_initcall(report_cpuid_table);
>> +arch_initcall(report_snp_info);
>
> Zap one more silly helper:
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/sev.c b/arch/x86/kernel/sev.c
> index 7955c024d5d7..ff5a32b0b21c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/sev.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/sev.c
> @@ -2356,32 +2356,23 @@ static void dump_cpuid_table(void)
> * sort of indicator, and there's not really any other good place to do it,
> * so do it here.
> */
> -static void __init report_cpuid_table(void)
> +static int __init report_snp_info(void)
> {
> const struct snp_cpuid_table *cpuid_table = snp_cpuid_get_table();
>
> if (!cpuid_table->count)
> - return;
> + return 0;
Well you can't return in this case, just not report/dump the CPUID info.
So I'll remove the helpers and adjust accordingly.
Thanks,
Tom
>
> pr_info("Using SNP CPUID table, %d entries present.\n",
> cpuid_table->count);
>
> if (sev_cfg.debug)
> dump_cpuid_table();
> -}
>
> -static void __init report_vmpl_level(void)
> -{
> if (!cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_GUEST_SEV_SNP))
> - return;
> + return 0;
>
> pr_info("SNP running at VMPL%u.\n", vmpl);
> -}
> -
> -static int __init report_snp_info(void)
> -{
> - report_vmpl_level();
> - report_cpuid_table();
>
> return 0;
> }
>
More information about the Svsm-devel
mailing list